Criminal Defense and Civil Litigation

good advice from every perspective...

Phone

(617) 723-4163

DO YOU NEED HELP? CONTACT US NOW. CALLS RETURNED 24/7.

All Inquiries Will Be Returned Promptly.

    • ELEMENTS

    Annoying and Accosting is a rather broad offense that involves offensive and disorderly conduct towards a member of the opposite sex. In order to prove the defendant guilty of Annoying and Accosting, the Commonwealth must prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That the defendant knowingly engaged in an offensive and disorderly act (or acts), or offensive and disorderly language;
    Second: That the defendant intended to direct that conduct to [alleged victim];
    Third: That [alleged victim] was aware of the defendant’s offensive and disorderly conduct;
    Fourth: That this conduct was offensive to a reasonable person; and
    Fifth: That [alleged victim] was a person of the opposite sex.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: 6 months to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections
    • Fines: Up to $200
    • NOTES:
    • Offensive and disorderly are distinct elements. The Commonwealth must prove both that the conduct was offensive and disorderly.
    • The offense may be committed in public or in private.
    • ELEMENTS

    A criminal Civil Rights violation occurs when a defendant, by force or threat of force, injures, intimidates or interferes with another’s exersise of a constitutional or statutory right. In order to prove the defendant guilty of a Civil Rights violation, the Commonwealth must prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That [alleged victim] was exercising a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or of the United States;
    Second: That the defendant either injured, intimidated, interfered with, oppressed or threatened the exercise or enjoyment of that legally protected right by [alleged victim], or attempted to do so;
    Third: That the defendant did so by using force or by threatening to use force; and
    Fourth: That the defendant did so wilfully.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: to 1.0 year in the House of Corrections
    • Fines: Up to $1,000
    • WITH BODILY INJURY
    • Sentencing: Up to 10.0 years in State Prison
    • Fines: Up to $10,000
    • NOTES:
    • Force means physical force, directed either against a person or against property, but the amount of physical force used does not matter. Even a minimal amount of force is sufficient.
    • A threat of force is an expression of an intention to use force which is communicated to the person threatened.
    • ELEMENTS

    Criminal Harassment is essentially an ongoing malicious pattern of conduct towards another individual. In order to prove the defendant guilty of Criminal Harassment, the Commonwealth must prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That the defendant engaged in a knowing pattern of conduct or speech, or series of acts, on at least three separate occasions;
    Second: That the defendant intended to target [the alleged victim] with the harassing conduct or speech, or series of acts, on each occasion;
    Third: That the conduct or speech, or series of acts, were of such a nature that they seriously alarmed [the alleged victim];
    Fourth: That the conduct or speech, or series of acts, were of such a nature that they would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress; and
    Fifth: That the defendant committed the conduct or speech, or series of acts, willfully and maliciously.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: Up to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections
    • Fines: Up to $1,000
    • SECOND OFFENSE
    • Sentencing: Up to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections; up to 10.0 years in State Prison
    • Fines: None
    • NOTES:
    • An act is done with malice if the defendant’s conduct was intentional and without justification or mitigation, and any reasonably prudent person would have foreseen the actual harm that resulted to [the alleged victim].
    • Although the statute reaches harassing speech, it does not reach protected speech. Specifically, it reaches only fighting words.
    • ELEMENTS

    This charge covers repeated harassing or annoying telephone calls or electronic communication, or obscene telephone calls or electronic communication.  In order to prove the defendant guilty of Harassing Telephone Calls, the Commonwealth must prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That the defendant (made telephone calls to) (caused telephone calls to be made to) (contacted by electronic communication) (caused to be contacted by electronic communication) [name of person] repeatedly, which means three or more times; and

    Second: That the defendant’s sole purpose in (making the telephone calls) (having the telephone calls made) (making the contacts by electronic communication) (causing the contacts by electronic communication to be made) was either to harass, annoy or molest [name of person] or his (her) family.

    In order to prove the defendant guilty of Obsscene Telephone Calls, the Commonwealth must prove that in making those repeated (calls) (electronic communications), the defendant used indecent or obscene language.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: Up to 6 months in the House of Corrections
    • Fines: Up to $500
    • NOTES:
    • Where, in addition to evidence of specific calls traced to the defendant, there is evidence of other, anonymous telephone calls, the judge has discretion to permit the jury to consider such evidence as probative of the defendant’s intent to harass, annoy or molest if such evidence would permit (even if it would not compel) an inference that the defendant was the source of such anonymous calls.
    • The Commonwealth must prove that the defendant’s only purpose was to annoy, harass or molest [name of person] or his (her) family.
    • The Commonwealth must prove only that the phone call was initiated or communication sent, not that the alleged victim actually received them.
    • ELEMENTS

    Stalking is similar to Criminal Harassment, but involves a series of willful and malicious acts that cause alarm or annoyance, done in combination with a threat of death or bodily. In order to prove the defendant guilty of Criminal Harassment, the Commonwealth must prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That over a period of time the defendant knowingly engaged in a pattern of conduct or series of acts, involving at least three incidents, directed at [alleged victim];
    Second: That those acts were of a kind that would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress;
    Third: That those acts did cause [alleged victim] to become seriously alarmed or annoyed;
    Fourth: That the defendant took those actions wilfully and maliciously; and
    Fifth: That the defendant also made a threat with the intention of placing [alleged victim] in imminent fear of death or bodily injury.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: Up to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections; Up to 5.0 years in State Prison
    • Fines: Up to $1,000
    • IN VIOLATION OF RESTRAINING ORDER
    • Sentencing: Up to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections (1 YEAR MANDATORY); up to 5.0 years in State Prison (1 YEAR MANDATORY)
    • Fines: None
    • SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE
    • Sentencing: Up to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections (2 YEARS MANDATORY); up to 10.0 years in State Prison (2 YEARS MANDATORY)
    • Fines: None
    • NOTES:
    • Violation of a 209A restraining order (G.L. c. 209A, § 7) is a lesser included offense of Stalking (G.L. c. 265, § 43), and therefore a defendant who has been convicted of violating a c. 209A order may not be convicted of Stalking based upon the same conduct.
    • The conduct, acts or threats may be communicated by any means.
    • ELEMENTS

    In order to prove the defendant guilty of Threat to Commit Crime, the Commonwealth must prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That the defendant expressed an intent to injure a person, or property of another, now or in the future;
    Second: That the defendant intended that his (her) threat be conveyed to a particular person;
    Third: That the injury that was threatened, if carried out, would constitute a crime; and
    Fourth: That the defendant made the threat under circumstances which could reasonably have caused the person to whom it was conveyed to fear that the defendant had both the intention and the ability to carry out the threat.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: Up to 6 months in the House of Corrections
    • Fines: Up to $100
    • ALTERNATIVE DISPOSITION
    • Sentencing: General Laws c. 275, § 4 authorizes a maximum sentence of six months imprisonment or, alternatively, a peace bond for a maximum period of six months. There is no six-month limitation on any probationary period.
    • NOTES:
    • The offense of threatening to commit a crime only reaches cases of “true threats,” which do not qualify as protected speech. The term “true threat” distinguishes between words that literally threaten but have an expressive purpose such as political hyperbole, and words that are intended to place the target of the threat in fear.
    • The legal definition of threat requires ‘communication’ of the threat in the sense that it must be uttered, not idly, but to the target, to one who the defendant intends to pass it on to the target, or to one who the defendant should know will probably pass it on to the target.
    • ELEMENTS

    In order to prove the defendant guilty of Violation of an Abuse Prevention Order, the Commonwealth must prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That a court had issued an order pursuant to chapter 209A against the defendant;
    Second: That such order was in effect on the date when its violation allegedly occurred;
    Third: That the defendant knew that the pertinent term(s) of the order (was) (were) in effect, either by having received a copy of the order or by having learned of it in some other way; and
    Fourth: That the defendant violated the order.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: Up to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections
    • Fines: Up to $2,000
    • NOTES:
    • If a person subject to a restraining order happens upon a protected person whom he or she did not and could not reasonably know to be present at that time and place, the party subject to the order must make reasonable efforts to terminate the accidental encounter.
    • The statute does not require any specific mens rea or intent to violate the order, merely knowledge of and violation of the order.
    • ELEMENTS

    In order to prove the defendant guilty of Violation a Harassment Prevention Order, the Commonwealth must prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
    First: That a court had issued an order pursuant to chapter 258E against the defendant;
    Second: That such order was in effect on the date when its violation allegedly occurred;
    Third: That the defendant knew that the pertinent term(s) of the order (was) (were) in effect, either by having received a copy of the order or by having learned of it in some other way; and
    Fourth: That the defendant violated the order.

    • PENALTIES FOR CONVICTION
    • Sentencing: Up to 2.5 years in the House of Corrections
    • Fines: Up to $2,000
    • NOTES:
    • Where act constituting violation was committed by third party, Commonwealth must prove act was intended by defendant but not that defendant intended to violate order.
    • The statute does not require any specific mens rea or intent to violate the order, merely knowledge of and violation of the order.

Contact a Massachusetts Abuse Crimes Attorney

If you are under investigation or have been charged with an abuse related offense, the attorney you choose is the single most important decision you will make. I have been dealing with criminal cases at both the trial and appellate level for 18 years, as a Prosecutor, a Criminal Defense attorney and as a Special Prosecutor. I am happy to meet with you and discuss your case at no cost to you. Please call at 617.723.4163 or fill out the Contact Form to schedule an appointment at your convenience.

Please contact the office to schedule a free consultation.

  • Andrew is a former Assistant District Attorney who has also been appointed as a Special Prosecutor in serious criminal matters involving Police Corruption, Sexual Assault and Attempted Murder. He is an experienced Massachusetts criminal defense trial and appellate attorney who represents individuals in all criminal matters, including…

    • Federal & State Crimes
    • Felonies & Misdemeanors
    • District Court
    • Superior Court
    • Appeals Court
    • Murder
    • Attempted Murder
    • White Collar Crime
    • Sexual Assault
    • Domestic Violence
    • Conspiracy
    • MoneyLaundering
    • Manslaughter
    • Motion to Seal Record
    • Kidnapping
    • Identity Theft
    • Possession Controlled Substances
    • Counterfeiting
    • Illegal Gambling
    • Obstruction of Law Enforcement
    • Domestic Violence
    • Illegal Wiretapping
    • Assault Attorney
    • Harassment
    • Bookmaking
    • Motion for a New Trial
    • Clerk Magistrate Hearings

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Andrew is a former insurance defense attorney who represents people and businesses -plaintiffs and defendants- in both state and federal court. In addition to individuals, he has represented businesses ranging from one-person operations to the biggest retail establishments in the country, facing exposure from the thousands of dollars to the millions, and handles civil cases from pre-suit investigation through trial and, if necessary, to the appeals court. He is an experienced civil litigation trial and appellate attorney who represents individuals and businesses in all civil matters, including…

    • Personal Injury
    • Product Liability
    • Premises Liability
    • Social Host Liability
    • Automobile Accidents
    • Attorney Malpractice
    • Business Disputes
    • Contract Actions
    • Fiduciary Trustee Litigation
    • Estate Litigation
    • Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Property Damage Claims
    • Construction Site Injuries
    • Dram Shop Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • Victims of Sexual Assault
    • Victims of Assault and Battery
    • Commercial Vehicle Accidents
    • G.L. c. 93A
    • Negligent Security
    • Contractor/Homeowner Construction Disputes

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Prospective Client Calls

      Individuals considering retaining Attorney Berman can contact the firm through the Contact form or by calling 617.723.4163. Please include in your message a short statement of the reason for contacting the office, as well as the best method and time to contact you.  Attorney Berman will return your message promptly to learn more about your case and, if appropriate, schedule an initial consultation.

      IF YOUR MATTER REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, PLEASE CALL OR PUT “URGENT’ IN THE SUBJECT BOX OF THE CONTACT FORM.  You will be contacted immediately.

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • The Initial Consultation

      The goal of the first meeting is for Attorney Berman to gain a clear understanding of the situation and for both attorney and client to determine whether to enter into a longer, more substantial attorney-client relationship. You should bring with you any documents and paperwork relevant to your case or, if possible, provide them beforehand. During this session, Andrew will gather relevant information, ascertain your objectives and provide you with a preliminary assessment of your situation, including possible strategies and tactics. If the decision is made to move forward, future fee arrangements and a retainer agreement (if applicable) should then be discussed.

      The initial consultation will generally last 30 to 60 minutes and is free of charge.

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Fee Agreements

      Below is a general description of the various types of fee agreements considered by Attorney Berman. Ultimately, the type of agreement entered into, and the amount charged, depends on the nature of your case.

      Flat Fee

      A flat fee is a set amount of money that is decided upon at the beginning of the representation, before any work is done on the case. This type of agreement is generally used for certain criminal offenses or in situations that require a limited number of court appearances.

      Hourly Rate

      To state the obvious, in an hourly case, the fee you pay is calculated by multiplying the hourly rate by the number of hours the attorney spends working on your case. Hourly rate agreements are generally used in serious criminal matters, civil defense (representation of an individual or company being sued in Civil court) and certain plaintiff cases (representation of an individual or business suing someone else in Civil Court). The hourly rate and the required retainer will vary depending on type and complexity of the case.

      Contingency Fee 

      A contingency fee agreement is standard in personal injury matters (where an individual brings claims in Civil court for his or her personal injuries) and may also be used in certain other types of plaintiff cases.  The fee your attorney earns is, as the name suggests, contingent upon there being a monetary recovery in your case and there is no fee due unless we win your case.   A fairly standard percentage for a contingent fees is one-third of the total recovery.   These types of agreements are not ethically permitted in criminal cases.

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Client Bill of Rights

      1. You are entitled to be treated with courtesy and consideration at all times by Attorney Berman and the other lawyers and non-lawyer personnel in the office.

      2. You are entitled to have Attorney Berman and any other attorney handle your legal matter competently and diligently, in accordance with the highest standards of the profession.  If you are not satisfied with how your matter is being handled, you have the right to discharge your attorney and terminate the attorney-client relationship at any time.

      3. You are entitled to Attorney Berman’s independent professional judgment and undivided loyalty uncompromised by conflicts of interest.

      4. You are entitled to be charged reasonable fees and expenses and to have Attorney Berman explain before or within a reasonable time after commencement of the representation how the fees and expenses will be computed and the manner and frequency of billing. You may refuse to enter into any arrangement for fees and expenses that you find unsatisfactory.  In hourly cases, you are entitled to request and receive a written itemized bill at reasonable intervals.

      5.  You are entitled to have your questions and concerns addressed promptly and to receive a prompt reply to your letters, telephone calls, emails, faxes, and other communications.

      6.  You are entitled to be kept reasonably informed as to the status of your matter and are entitled to have Attorney Berman promptly comply with your reasonable requests for information, including your requests for copies of papers relevant to the matter.  You are entitled to sufficient information to allow you to participate meaningfully in the development of your matter and make informed decisions regarding representation.

      7.  You are entitled to have your legitimate objectives respected.  In particular, the decision of whether to settle your matter in a civil case, or enter into a plea agreement in a criminal case, is yours alone.

      8.  You have the right to privacy in your communications with Attorney Berman, and anyone working for him or on his behalf, and to have your confidential information preserved to the extent permitted by law.

      9. You are entitled to have Attorney Berman, and anyone working for him or on his behalf, conduct himself or herself ethically in accordance with the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Responsibility.

      10.  You may not be refused representation on the basis of race, creed, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or disability.

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

  • Please include in your message a short statement of the reason for contacting the office, as well as the best method and time to contact you. Attorney Berman will return your message promptly to learn more about your case and, if appropriate, schedule an initial consultation.
  • Andrew is a Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer who represents clients facing both felonies and misdemeanors throughout Massachusetts, including the following counties, cities and towns…

    • BARNSTABLE
    • Bourne
    • Brewster
    • Chatham
    • Dennis
    • Eastham
    • Falmouth
    • Harwich
    • Mashpee
    • Orleans
    • Provincetown
    • Sandwich
    • Truro
    • Wellfleet
    • Yarmouth

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Adams
    • Alford
    • Becket
    • Cheshire
    • Clarksburg
    • Dalton
    • Egremont
    • Florida
    • Great Barrington
    • Hancock
    • Hinsdale
    • Lanesborough
    • Lee
    • Lenox
    • Monterey
    • Mt. Washington
    • New Ashford
    • New Marlborough
    • NORTH ADAMS
    • Otis
    • Peru
    • PITTSFIELD*
    • Richmond
    • Sandisfield
    • Savoy
    • Sheffield
    • Stockbridge
    • yringham
    • Washington
    • West Stockbridge
    • Williamstown
    • Windsor

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Acushnet
    • ATTLEBORO
    • Berkley
    • artmouth
    • Dighton
    • Easton
    • Fairhaven
    • FALL RIVER
    • Freetown
    • Mansfield
    • NEW BEDFORD
    • North Attleborough
    • Norton
    • Raynham
    • Rehoboth
    • Seekonk
    • Somerset
    • Swansea
    • TAUNTON
    • Westport

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Aquinnah
    • Chilmark
    • Edgartown
    • Gosnold
    • Oak Bluffs
    • Tisbury
    • West Tisbury

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • AMESBURY
    • Andover
    • BEVERLY
    • Boxford
    • Danvers
    • Essex
    • Georgetown
    • GLOUCESTER
    • Groveland
    • Hamilton
    • HAVERHILL
    • Ipswich
    • LAWRENCE
    • LYNN
    • Lynnfield
    • Manchester by the sea
    • Marblehead
    • Merrimac
    • METHUEN
    • Middleton
    • Nahant
    • Newbury
    • NEWBURYPORT
    • orth Andover
    • PEABODY
    • Rockport
    • Rowley
    • SALEM
    • Salisbury
    • Saugus
    • Swampscott
    • Topsfield
    • Wenham
    • West Newbury
    • Essex County Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Essex County Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Essex County Trial Attorney
    • Essex County Trial Lawyer

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Ashfield
    • Bernardston
    • Buckland
    • Charlemont
    • Colrain
    • Conway
    • Deerfield
    • Erving
    • Gill
    • GREENFIELD
    • Hawley
    • Heath
    • Leverett
    • Leyden
    • Monroe
    • Montague
    • New Salem
    • Northfield
    • Orange
    • Rowe
    • Shelburne
    • Shutesbury
    • Sunderland
    • Warwick
    • Wendell
    • Whately
    • Franklin County Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Franklin County Criminal Defense Lawyer

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • AGAWAM
    • Blandford
    • Brimfield
    • Chester
    • CHICOPEE
    • East Longmeadow
    • Granville
    • Hampden
    • Holland
    • HOLYOKE
    • Longmeadow
    • Ludlow
    • Monson
    • Montgomery
    • PALMER
    • Russell
    • Southwick
    • SPRINGFIELD
    • Tolland
    • Wales
    • WEST SPRINGFIELD
    • WESTFIELD
    • Wilbraham
    • Springfield Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Springfield Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Springfield Felony Attorney
    • Springfield Felony Lawyer
    • Springfield Sex Crimes Lawyer
    • Springfield Trial Attorney
    • Springfield White Collar Crime Attorney

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Amherst
    • Belchertown
    • Chesterfield
    • Cummington
    • EASTHAMPTON
    • Goshen
    • Granby
    • Hadley
    • Hatfield
    • Huntington
    • Middlefield
    • NORTHAMPTON
    • Pelham
    • Plainfield
    • South Hadley
    • Southampton
    • Ware
    • Westhampton
    • Williamsburg
    • Worthington

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Acton
    • Arlington
    • Ashby
    • Ashland
    • Ayer
    • Bedford
    • Belmont
    • Billerica
    • Boxborough
    • Burlington
    • CAMBRIDGE
    • Carlisle
    • Chelmsford
    • Concord
    • Dracut
    • Dunstable
    • EVERETT
    • Framingham
    • Groton
    • Holliston
    • Hopkinton
    • Hudson
    • Lexington
    • Lincoln
    • Littleton
    • LOWELL
    • MALDEN
    • MARLBOROUGH
    • Maynard
    • MEDFORD
    • MELROSE
    • Natick
    • NEWTON
    • North Reading
    • Pepperell
    • Reading
    • Sherborn
    • Shirley
    • SOMERVILLE
    • Stoneham
    • Stow
    • Sudbury
    • Tewksbury
    • Townsend
    • Tyngsborough
    • Wakefield
    • WALTHAM
    • WATERTOWN
    • Wayland
    • Westford
    • Weston
    • Wilmington
    • Winchester
    • WOBURN
    • Cambridge Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Cambridge Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Lowell Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Lowell Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Lowell Sex Crimes Lawyer
    • Lowell Trial Attorney
    • Lowell Trial Lawyer
    • Lowell White Collar Crime Attorney
    • Middlesex County Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Middlesex County Criminal Defense Lawyer

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Nantucket

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Avon
    • Bellingham
    • BRAINTREE
    • Brookline
    • Canton
    • Cohasset
    • Dedham
    • Dover
    • Foxborough
    • FRANKLIN
    • Holbrook
    • Medfield
    • Medway
    • Millis
    • Milton
    • Needham
    • Norfolk
    • Norwood
    • Plainville
    • QUINCY
    • RANDOLPH
    • Sharon
    • Stoughton
    • Walpole
    • Wellesley
    • Westwood
    • WEYMOUTH
    • Wrentham
    • Dedham Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Dedham Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Quincy Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Quincy Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Quincy Shoplifting Attorney
    • Quincy Shoplifting Lawyer
    • Quincy Trial Lawyer

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Abington
    • BRIDGEWATER
    • BROCKTON
    • Carver
    • Duxbury
    • East Bridgewater
    • Halifax
    • Hanover
    • Hanson
    • Hingham
    • Hull
    • Kingston
    • Lakeville
    • Marion
    • Marshfield
    • Mattapoisett
    • Middleborough
    • Norwell
    • Pembroke
    • Plymouth
    • Plympton
    • Rochester
    • Rockland
    • Scituate
    • Wareham
    • West Bridgewater
    • Whitman
    • Brockton Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Brockton Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Brockton Misdemeanor Attorney
    • Brockton Misdemeanor Lawyer
    • Brockton Trial Lawyer

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • BOSTON
    • CHELSEA
    • REVERE
    • WINTHROP
    • Boston Criminal Appeals Lawyer
    • Boston Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Boston Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Boston Felony Lawyer
    • Boston Rape Attorney
    • Boston Rape Lawyer
    • Boston Sex Crimes Attorney
    • Boston Sex Crimes Lawyer
    • Boston Trial Attorney
    • Boston Trial Lawyer
    • Boston Weapons Charges Lawyer
    • Boston White Collar Crime Attorney
    • Boston White Collar Crime Lawyer
    • Suffolk County Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Suffolk County Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Suffolk County Felony Attorney
    • Suffolk County Misdemeanor Lawyer

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    • Ashburnham
    • Athol
    • Auburn
    • Barre
    • Berlin
    • Blackstone
    • Bolton
    • Boylston
    • Brookfield
    • Charlton
    • Clinton
    • Douglas
    • Dudley
    • East Brookfield
    • FITCHBURG
    • GARDNER
    • Grafton
    • Hardwick
    • Harvard
    • Holden
    • Hopedale
    • Hubbardston
    • Lancaster
    • Leicester
    • LEOMINSTER
    • Lunenburg
    • Mendon
    • Milford
    • Millbury
    • Millville
    • New Braintree
    • North Brookfield
    • Northborough
    • Northbridge
    • Oakham
    • Oxford
    • Paxton
    • Petersham
    • Phillipston
    • Princeton
    • Royalston
    • Rutland
    • Shrewsbury
    • Southborough
    • SOUTHBRIDGE
    • Spencer
    • Sterling
    • Sturbridge
    • Sutton
    • Templeton
    • Upton
    • Uxbridge
    • Warren
    • Webster
    • West Boylston
    • West Brookfield
    • Westborough
    • Westminster
    • Winchendon
    • WORCESTER*
    • Worcester Criminal Defense Attorney
    • Worcester Criminal Defense Lawyer
    • Worcester Felony Attorney
    • Worcester Felony Lawyer
    • Worcester Misdemeanor Lawyer
    • Worcester Trial Attorney

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusFacebooktwittergoogle_plus